I suspect he’s never met a “Terrorist”

And further, he’d likely piss his pants and run, screaming like a frightened 4 year old girl, if he ever did. 

Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy (D) this week accused the National Rifle Association (NRA) of acting like a “terrorist organization.”

If he really thought we were all terrorists, I think he’d be a lot more circumspect. Some of us actually are as dangerous as he implies we are we are….

I laughed


(Link fixt)

But I am seriously gonna have to try THIS next time some chick thinks it is OK to put her spawn into my arms without asking first…

So far, unconfirmed:

And yet, all the pieces are there:

Seems that the City of Baltimore can afford to spend a Hundred Thousand Dollars (yep, $100,000.00) to send kids to a leftist protest at Washington DC regarding firearms……(Forget that the State is paying for a Leftist protest, which should be the subject of a question all on it’s own)….But they apparently COULD come up with the money to bus kids to the protest, but claimed earlier this year that they couldn’t pay to fix the heat in their schools. 

Odd set of priorities there, if you ask me.

Waiting with bated breath:

Ok, not really.

But I am waiting to see what sort of penalty the ATF(e) brings down on this woman for illegally creating an SBR.  Having both the lower and the short barrel in your possession can be used as cause for prosecution, even if they aren’t assembled….

‘Cause if she gets away with it, then I might have to inadvertently make that mistake too. And keep it (both pieces) as a reminder of what not to do in the future……

She, of course, claims she knew what she was doing (demonstration of “Intent”?) and then, afterwards, took it to the police department…(Colluding with others to hide a crime?) and it has now been reported to the ATF.

If she isn’t prosecuted, the I think the rest of us should be able to do the same….and since they let her get away with it, we all could too (equal before the law)….

(I need to add that I really have no need for an SBR, as I’m not a door kicker and prefer my rifle cartridges have actual, you know, velocity and such)

Lemme see if I got this straight:?

Trump wants to enforce a Non Disclosure Agreement against someone with whom he has had no contact, that does not in any way affect him, because…..Why? If he’s not involved then what does it matter? And if he IS involved…..

And she wants the courts to nullify it because she wants to talk, and even though she signed it and agreed to the terms of the Non Disclosure agreement, she thinks that because public comments feel she should be able to violate it without penalties, it should be null and void?

I’m getting confused here….