and buried under the entrails of 10 pigs, each one of ’em.
Probably deep under a pigsty, just to be sure.
France puzzles over what to do with Paris attackers’ bodies
It’d be a lesson for the rest.
And, when you publicized that fact, would be a deterrent to other would be psychotic jihadis. Do terrorism in France…kill our citizens, and we will defile your remains for all time.
74 years ago, the Japanese opened the ball….
over 2000 sailors were killed, over a thousand wounded…
Remember.
Something was fucked up wrong with the old template and it wouldn’t work, or even let me in to edit it..
SO for now, we got this…
I will tweak it better as soon as I have the time and energy.
Because some people used some weapons in a manner that is illegal, everyone who owns such weapons must suffer….
Freedoms guaranteed by the Constitution should be curtailed.
We should use as a litmus test a list that is arbitrary, that is generated by bureaucrats, with essentially zero right of appeal (and no notification that you are even ON the list)…. and no right to face your accuser or a trial or Due Process….
A list that the perpetrators of the last two muslim terrorist incidents weren’t on….
We need to do something about these Muslim Extremists (who are a small part of Mohammemdisn) who use a twisted interpretation of the Muslim Faith (even though they take the words of the Koran literally)…..
We have to fight ISIL, and other extremists……
But Barry failed to suggest that what we really need to do is to cut off the source of funds for these extremists…..which (mostly) come from oil revenues in the Gulf states…..
(We could easily damage those revenues by placing a surtax on all gulf oil….say a 10 or 20 percent sales tariff on oil from those origins…..)
There should be no religious test for immigrants (even though we currently make it easy for Muslims and very, very hard for Christians and Copts, who REALLY are the refugees)…..
Oh, and Assault Rifles are BAD.
Did I miss anything?
And using all the buzzwords.
“Multiautomatic round Weapons”….”Gunshow loophole”.
Yet her ignorance about that which she speaks is profound…..
Almost as bad as this guy…
I am, of course, already a member. Not because I slavishly agree with the NRA, but because they arer the biggest, if not the best, gun rights organization here is the US. Politicians respect numbers.
Click HERE to give Vulgar Curmedgeon his MILLION HITS.
He’s good, and worth reading….and his links on the sidebars are awesome.
Hit him up and help him over the top.
We thank you for your support.
That the FBI and local police LEFT THE San Bernardino killers DWELLINGS UNGUARDED and (either through incompetence or stupidity) allowed the landlord to show the apartment to reporters.…allowing them to wander around and coonfinger the contents. (who knows what was picked up and removed?) Who knows what evidence was destroyed?
It almost seems as if the cops or FBI was allowing the destruction of evidence…..
It is “Freedom of”, not “freedom FROM”.
{It actually says “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof”}
which clashes with:
A federal judge has banished the Baby Jesus and the Three Wise Men from an Indiana high school’s Christmas musical.
and:
“The living nativity scene impermissibly conveys an endorsement of religion and thus runs afoul of the Establishment Clause,”
Now, I am, actually totally against a State Approved Religion.
But I fail to see how the above equals a SAR.
If the kids wish to do their live Nativity scene, then isn’t that “the free exercise thereof“? I would have an objection if the children of, say, a Muslim family were required to participate in any portion of the Christmas pageant Holiday presentation….But if the children wish to do so, and their parents have no objection, then……what, exactly, is the deal? (We all know it is a Christmas pageant, even if they have renamed it)
Perhaps a statement before the pageant declaring that this is a volunteer presentation and In No Way endorses this religion as a State Approved religion?
and gun grabbers(but I repeat myself)…..
What, exactly, do you want to propose for “Common sense gun laws” that (short of outlawing all firearms and/or confiscation ) would have prevented these jihadi psychos from doing what they did?
They were able to perpetrate their massacre in California, one of the states where gun laws are fairly restrictive.
What, exactly, would more laws have done to stop them from doing what they did?
Please, explain. Be specific.