So a police officer was tazed bay another officer while trying to apprehend a suspect at a Chicago area mall.
Watch the video. If you don’t at least smile about the 0:18 mark, then I just don’t know what to say.
So a police officer was tazed bay another officer while trying to apprehend a suspect at a Chicago area mall.
Watch the video. If you don’t at least smile about the 0:18 mark, then I just don’t know what to say.
So a plain old citizen armed with a handgun was at a mall food court when a whack job armed with a rifle opened fire into the crowd.
Dude with the handgun stepped up and stopped the threat by killing the rifle toting murderer.
He didn’t run away, he didn’t hide , he didn’t wait for backup.
He acted….and saved lives.
Contrast to Uvalde.
And the claim that citizens don’t need guns because the police will protect you has again been shown to be false.
Beers are on me sir, should we ever meet.
Now they need to send ’em to the other Blue cities as well….
Funny how if matters when it is a problem in the cites rather than the border states, innit?
Or they could just close the border.
Dr Birx also says that “Covid’s infectiousness was consistent with a virus which had been experimented on in a lab”,
‘In laboratories you grow the virus in human cells, allowing it to adapt more. Each time it passes through human cells it becomes more adapted,’
Also: MoS revealed that the head of the World Health Organisation privately believes the Covid pandemic started following a Chinese lab leak.
Funny, even the “experts” are starting to believe what all of us “Conspiracy theorists” have been saying all along……It is getting to be that the truth comes out months after we all state what is obvious.
He passed his instrument checkride.
Now he can go places, much less dependent on the weather.
Plus it just makes you a better all around pilot.
He worked even harder than I did, so I know he earned his certificate.
Drop on by and give him some congratulations.
Interesting article by the Daily Mail.
4:9 you never see this story on the Mainstream TV news.
And not just the Supremes, either
Ferinstance:
In the Complaint, Plaintiff States set forth examples of suppression of free speech, which include:
1. The Hunter Biden laptop story prior to the 2020 Presidential election;
2. Speech about the lab-leak theory of COVID-19’s origin;
3. Speech about the efficiency of masks and COVID-19 lockdowns; and
4. Speech about election integrity and the security of voting by mail.
And the courts have allowed the lawsuits AND given Expedited Discovery.
Essentially they are allowing lawsuits that will show collusion between the White House and the DNC and media (including Social Media!!) to suppress some stories and to censor Conservatives.
‘Bout fuckin’ time….
Here is the story with the video from the School hallway.
It is damning.
“Run away!”
Why is this in the Daily Mail but not all over the US media?
Why are any of the officers shown still employed? (Or run out of town on a rail, for that matter?)
I am gonna say that this is cowardice. Plain and simple. When one signs on to be a police officer, one has to plan to do more than write speeding tickets.
These men should be named in order that they can be called out for their cowardice and failure to protect the children of their community.
I wonder how many of the children bled out in the waiting period between the first and second attempt, and then how many more died from trauma before the final assault on the shooter?
Fail.
Really? Now they are claiming that there are more than two genders…..
When a medical health organization thinks this, it is a sure sign that the leadership has decided that science is no longer their driving force.
At which point the US and every other nation should cut funding and stop listening to what the World Healt Organization has to say about…..anything.
The DNC led anti firearms coalition seems to be pushing for enhanced Red Flag laws…allowing someone to claim that a person who own firearms is a danger to him/herself or others in the household or community.
Now, while the idea may or may not be a good one, I have an issue with the whole idea…
If a person is “Unstable” or “Dangerous” or “Violent” and a danger…then shouldn’t they be evaluated and sequestered (locked up) until we determine if they are a danger?
Lots of things can be used as weapons…..to hurt people.
Cars, knives, fire, poison, acids, clubs, etc.
If there is enough evidence to question as to the state of mind of the person involved for the court to order to remove his/her firearms from his home…shouldn’t he/she have a more thorough evaluation so that he/she can’t be a danger to family or society at large?
Change my mind.