Plans to discriminate….

Based on GENDER,,,,are, apparently, OK, as long as the recipients are the RIGHT gender.

“I believe we have now reached a crossroads where it is imperative that a woman-led board acquire control of the company and create content that continues to inspire audiences around the world, especially our young girls and boys,” Contreras-Sweet said in the letter.

So it is OK to state that the “New” company will have a woman led board of directors, the majority of which MUST be women.

Isn’t that discrimination by gender? If discrimination is bad, then it is bad. Reverse discrimination is still discrimination. And announcing that one plans to discriminate would seem to me to be a conspiracy to do so….

How about folks who are neither “standard” or “Biological” gender???? Will there be an appropriate number of trans individuals on the board??

Toldjasoo

Seems that ALL SORTS OF LIBERAL GROUPS have been lining up to use the school kids from Parkland and other schools as props in their argument/Meat puppets/ examples of something…

I toldya that the kids were being used by someone….and that someone was paying the bills to move ’em around and feed ’em. .

Note the list of the groups: Planned Parenthood? Really? (Irony Alert here…..) This is why I think they should get ZERO funding from the federal government. Unions? Really?

Any parent who allows his or her child to be used like this as a prop by Leftist groups (or, in other instances, a Right group) is a fool, and an idiot.

It occurs to me….

That all these folks that want a ban on firearms and more “Gun Control” and other restrictions on our Second Amendment rights should consider this:

If you fear for your children’s safety, and want restrictions on “guns” for that reason, then y’all should also want restrictions on Pakistanis, Somalis, Iraqis, Iranians and Palestinians (and other folks from predominantly muslim areas)….especially men between 16 and 30 of Muslim descent.

After all, your chances of having one of them detonate a bomb or shoot up some public area or otherwise perpetrate an act of terror in a mall or other public place are higher than a white male shooting them in a school…...(do the math, both chances are nearly infinitesimally small)

Why aren’t you asking for the banning of Muslims as well as “Assault Weapons”?

“It’s for the Children”….”If it saves even one life”…

(Note for the stupid: The above was satire, perhaps in bad taste, but satire nonetheless. The statistics are correct, sadly. The odds of either happening are not that different ,however. And no, I don’t want to ban Muslims…Nor have background checks before purchasing one…I do think that we shoud have limits on how many can be in one home though. …Just pointing out some facts and trying to show some stupidity in the hysteria ) If this offends you then grow up and get a life….Or grow a set. 

y’know…

TheDonald shows us that he really isn’t a Second Amendment guy.

The more he talks, the more he shows his ignorance about firearms in general, and firearms laws and purchasing in particular.

Were he to be handed a gun, of any kind, I’m not so sure he’d know how to pick it up, much less holg it or use it.

He is, after all, a denizen of Noo Yawk Citee at heart. Even the cops there aren’t sure how to use firearms…..

Denton County Sheriff:

How come

Billy Graham gets to lie in state at the Rotunda?

Seriously, he was a decent man, apparently a great pastor, but, in the end, just a man. Why do they give him the honor, and deny so many others?

Ultimately, what makes his corpse so special?

How many times can they stop?

I mean, I don’t shop at Dicks Sporting Goods anyway. They have very little that I want, and what items they do carry aren’t geared towards my demographic (old/white/male) but rather trendy clothing and stuff that appeals to Millenials.

Their firearms department had, as far as I knew, given up AR-style rifles and high round count magazines years ago, in some Virtue Signalling display after, either the Aurora Colorado shooing or perhaps another one much earlier…..I forget. (ETA: it was the Sandy Hook shooting)

But, either way, they gave up AR-15 style rifles once already. I’ve not been back to a Dicks since. I refuse to patronize places whose management uses tragedy to Virtue Signal.

Yet, oddly, they are giving them up again. How is that? I don’t remember there being a sunset provision of the sales of “Weapons of War” or whatever they called them then. Is profit a motivator that trumps Virtue Signalling? Or did they think that all their customers would forget? Is there a repeal date for this decision? Do they think it will help them get a boost selling Yeti cooler knockoffs and semi casual stylish workout wear and expensive boots and outdoor wear to their millenial customers for a while?

ETA: apparently they are serious this time: “This time it’s permanent“…One wonders why they don’t simply stop selling all firearms?

Expect their stock to fall….unexpectedly. They are all ready having issues. I expect them to fail soon.