Well, scratch Marco off the list

Rubio wants too much “Immigration Reform” and doesn’t seem to understand what the issues are.

So that makes my job easier come 2016…. One more person off the list….

“Well, at some point it is going to have to end, that is to say, it can’t continue being the permanent policy of the United States,” Rubio said. “I believe, if I become President, it is going to be possible to achieve immigration reform. It is not going to be comprehensive, that is to say, it is not going to all be in one massive bill. We already tried that a few years ago. We’ve seen there isn’t political support for it and I think we’ve wasted a lot of time in this process, when we could have made progress through the steps I’ve advocated.


AND


Rubio answered that DACA will end only when a legislative substitute with the exact same or similar policy prescriptions—a legislative amnesty for illegal alien minors—is implemented. He also said in Spanish that, if elected president, he believes that America cannot deport illegal aliens here in the country right now, and he expects a legislative solution will be implemented that essentially has all the parts of the massively controversial “Gang of Eight” bill that he would pass piece-by-piece.

Question: Why do some people think that everyone in the world has the right to come into the United States and assume the benefits of citizenship?…especially those who have come over the border illegally?

I’d really like an answer to that question.

Oh, and before I get hate speech tossed my way? I am the son and grandson of immigrants.

Happy Birthday

Today, really, was the birthday of what we have as a nation today.

Today, 240 years ago, our ancestors and forebears began the war which led to the birth of our nation. This was the day, 240 years ago, when they fought  the British,…..and, essentially, opened the ball in the Revolutionary war.

Raise a glass, take some time, and think about those brave men who took to arms to keep their way of life, and who eventually told the King of England to piss off.

“Stand yer ground, Don’t fire unless fired upon.
But if they mean to have a war, then let it begin here”

CPT John Parker. 4/19/1775

A thought:


If William Dawes name had rhymed better, then he might well have been memorialized instead of Paul Revere. 

Glad someone else noticed:

Someone who has enough clout to get this Police Officer, Clarence Habersham, who lied and helped to cover up a murder tossed off the force. Yes, a Police officer who lied and tried to cover up a murder by a fellow officer.

Thing here is, if he lied about the incident between Mr. Scott (dead, not talking) and Officer Michael Slager (whose story was totally refuted by the video), what else has he lied about? ALL of his prior testimony is suspect. Each and every time he arrested someone, every time he testified in court, all of it is now suspect.

And apparently, there is another officer who lied…Sargent James Gann.

Police bleed blue and all that. When is a crime enough that they will break ranks?

Not all police are bad. I know several that I respect, and if they told me that the sky had turned yellow I’d believe them. But some are bad. Very bad. Liars thieves and cheats.  And they stain the good officer’s uniforms as well.

You could easily fix that….. Just change your lifestyle:

     The reality is I am a hypocrite. My life is completely infused with greenhouse gases and fossil           fuel pollution. No matter how I try to untether myself from the system–abstaining from air             travel in North America and buying carbon offset when I visit family in South Africa, changing       all the lightbulbs in our house and hang drying clothes in the attic, walking or biking instead of       driving–still I am responsible for over 13 tons of carbon pollution every year simply because I         live in the USA. According to the World Bank, the average American is responsible for 17.6 tons       of carbon pollution each year, while the world average per person is 5 tons. Why is this?

The answer is convenience. And simplicity. We like our lifestyle. We like the ease of heating our homes with Natural Gas. We like the fact that when we flip a switch that a light comes on. That we don’t have to worry about spoiling food (because the Fridge keeps it cold)…that we don’t have to pump our own water, because electricity keeps it flowing to our homes and faucets. That we don’t have to wash our clothes by hand, because the electricity makes the washer and dryer work. We like not having to walk, or bicycle, or having to hitch up a horse to a cart…(and just keeping a horse is work)…

I know people who do live a truly “Low Carbon” lifestyle. But it is work, and they don’t have all the modern conveniences…..and they never (or at lest very seldom) go anywhere. I heat my house (about 75% ) with wood and I gotta tell you, it is work. You gotta cut up the tree (so far, for 20 years, Mother Nature has damaged enough trees that I haven’t had to cut down a perfectly good one, only ones that come down in storms) haul it, season it, split it, stack it, and then feed the woodstove. There is more than just turning up the thermostat. You also have to look forward and make sure that you have enough wood for the season, and further look to see that you have enough inside to feed the stove for the evening…… Same goes for those who burn vegetable oil in a diesel car, or who make their own ethanol (which, BTW, makes a LOT of CO2 in the fermentation process)

But Mr. Toscano isn’t willing to have that kind of lifestyle. He still likes to travel, he likes all of his modern conveniences. He’s not willing to find and cut and haul wood to heat his home and his water and his food. He’s not willing to pump water by hand, and he likes those imported fruits and vegetables in February, when they aren’t available when grown locally. He won’t shut off his gas heat and won’t stop driving (or riding) in fossil fuel driven automobiles. He hasn’t unplugged his electric meter either.

In short, he IS the hypocrite he admits to being.

And since he can’t wean himself off that “High Carbon” lifestyle, he wants the Federal Government to force him (and, of course, everyone else in the US) to change their lifestyle. To raise the price of carbon dioxide production in order that we will (supposedly) produce less.

Now, the question of Global Warming (and the effect of all that terrible nasty Carbon Dioxide) aside (yeah, I know, but that is argument for another day) he feels that if we only had to pay more, we’d produce less. Yet it hasn’t worked with gasoline, and it hasn’t worked with natural gas nor electricity. Those prices for those items have risen dramatically, yet we, as a nation, aren’t using less per person.

He is right, in that if you want people to use less, then it should be more expensive. It does work for some things. But most people, like him, like that lifestyle that energy brings us. Not having to stoke a woodstove, or having to pump water, or haul wood….

Have you ever noticed that the Green folks always want a Statist solution….and that that solution is ALWAYS something that brings the productivity and level of lifestyle down for the US? That the solutions almost ALWAYS mirror the Socialist plan for the US? That the changes in lifestyle should always be done by Someone Else (but not them)?

So that officer?

You know, the one that killed the guy who was running away from him, who shot at him something like 8 times….and who killed the man?

The one who claims that the guy tried to steal his Tazer and use it against him.

Yeah, that cop.

The one who is shown on the video (apparently) dropping the same Tazer at the lifeless body of the man he just shot?

Yeah, that’s not the guy I am gonna talk about here.

What I want to know is what about the other cops, the ones that corroborated the first (above) one’s story? The ones that were there when he dropped the “evidence” at the body? The ones that filed a false police report. The ones that supported their fellow officer even when he committed murder…Are they still police officers?

If so, why? Why aren’t they in jail, charged with conspiracy after the fact? Conspiracy to conceal a murder? Conspiracy to hide the planting of evidence? Filing a false police report? Conspiracy in the filing of a false police report. (remember, there were TWO other officers…both of whom lied. 3 people, 3 SWORN POLICE OFFICERS lied in their reports. 3 sworn officers conspired to cover up a murder. Yet only one is charged.

hmmmm. How to answer?

Sometime a question needs a preface.

So….. one of the ladies on my staff has moved from semi-Urban to mostly rural area…

She has issues with large furry rodents in her stream in her backyard and needs help identifying them.

This morning: Her: “do you know what a beaver looks like?”.

Me: Poleaxed look. Not sure how to answer. (“Danger!, Will Robinson,  Danger!!”)

She: Realizes what she might have implied. “No, that’s not what I meant”.

Me: “Well, yes, I’ve seen a beaver or two in my time”.

(Not saying: “some are tasty too”….or “some are hairy and some are bald…”. ) But I wanted to SO badly…

Nope I didn’t go there, I just found something else to do elsewhere…