I hate Emoji’s

and I think they are one of the stupidest things the cell phone industry has come up with. They are a poor and childish embellishment to a basic communication.

I am only slightly less derisive of those who use them regularly in their conversations via text.

Most of us aren’t 7th grade girls, we shouldn’t act like it.

Time to Grow Up. Act your age, 

False

I really hate folks who falsely advertise products on the web.

It’s not like I’m not gonna see those flaws when I come to buy it.

Waste of my time, and theirs.

The Cherokees don’t care

But Lizzy Warren keeps pushing it, cause she knows we all know she was lying about her connection to the indian nations just to get special treatment at the university… a

She did (finally) take a DNA test…which was, as we expected, inconclusive anyway..
(ETA: Apparently she is less indian than the average white American citizen)

And the Cherokee nation stated:


“A DNA test is useless to determine tribal citizenship. Current DNA tests do not even distinguish whether a person’s ancestors were indigenous to North or South America. Sovereign tribal nations set their own legal requirements for citizenship, and while DNA tests can be used to determine lineage, such as paternity to an individual, it is not evidence for tribal affiliation. Using a DNA test to lay claim to any connection to the Cherokee Nation or any tribal nation, even vaguely, is inappropriate and wrong. It makes a mockery out of DNA tests and its legitimate uses while also dishonoring legitimate tribal governments and their citizens, whose ancestors are well documented and whose heritage is prove. Senator Warren is undermining tribal interests with her continued claims of tribal heritage.”


– Cherokee Nation Secretary of State Chuck Hoskin, Jr.




ETA2:


Yep

Truth HERE.

But not to Liberals.

Words mean something here in my world.

But to liberals they are only tools (much like the liberals themselves) to help their Party get what it wants. 

It never happens..

Women never lie. 

Especially about “sexual assault”.

Never. Ever. And they always deserve to be believed.

Always.

groped. By a 9 year old.

W.T.F.

I hope they charge her.  Especially for claiming to be a police officer.

Was there a racial component here?

WOMAN  forced to apologize after accusing a 9-year-old boy of sexual assault. But CCTV footage proved something else.

Women like this harm the credibility of women who have truly been assaulted.

Much less Ms Ford’s testimony and the harm it has done to real victims. 

Why no arrests?

Why can’t the Portland police arrest anyone for this anarchy and civil disobedience? Yeah, standing aside and letting them fight might be entertaining, and later breaking up the fight with pepperball rounds is no doubt fun, but why even allow this sort of shit to happen?

Note: Both sides come looking for a fight. Neither gets my sympathy. It is just plain wrong.
Their behavior chases decent people off the streets and makes the city and the police look like incompetent idiots.

And, at the end of the day, no matter what your motivation, you are acting like a criminal. And you should be treated that way.

Most boys grow out of such behavior about 16 years of age. These morons, obviously didn’t.

Y’all that call your self part of the Right? Get off my side.
You morons on the left? you aren’t doing your side any favors with your behavior.

I think they all need a bit of 1968 Chicago riot behavior modification lessons. Perhaps some of the old “Hickory Shampoo” applied liberally to both sides would temper their ardor for a fight.

Well, that was cool

I didn’t know there were any in the area. Was a bit north of the intersection of US 41 and US 30 in NW Indiana on Saturday and, while waiting at a stoplight, I watched a Bald Eagle fly circles over the marsh to the east of US 41.

I was unaware that there were any Bald Eagles in the area.

Perhaps the DDT issues have helped make a comeback? I dunno

I grew up about 20 miles to the east of there, and this is the first time I have ever seen a Bald Eagle in NW Indiana. And I am over 50 years old.

Your call, Hillary

“You cannot be civil with a political party that wants to destroy what you stand for, what you care about,”

Ok,, sister, then lets open the ball:
Here are some of the things YOUR party stands for that I find objectionable.

Statism over individualism.


Ever increasing restrictions on rights, rather than freedom.


More and more groups gaining privileged status over the mainstream.


Sociologist government policies.


Ever increasing governmental agencies, who set rules and regulations with no legislative oversight. 


Increasing dependence on government paid for by the productive people in this country.


More and more “Social Safety Nets” paid for with taxes, instead of those taxes going to infrastructure, and military as is Constitutional.  


Less and less attention paid to our Constitution and to the restrictions it imposes upon Government. 


Entire government agencies which don’t produce anything. 


Tax and monetary policies which punish success and hard work, encourage failure and laziness, reward stupidity and penalize intelligence.


An ever increasing percentage of urban dwellers(encouraged by your party and their policies) who produce nothing, but whose very existence is paid for by my side’s work. 


Ever increasing ILLEGAL immigration.


More and more (and more blatant) voter fraud. 

Etc.
Etc.
Etc.

I can make a longer list of “things I stand for, things I care about” that your philosophy and your party condone …that I find offensive and objectionable. But so far, at least, MY side has retained “civility” about our disagreements.

Wanna lose “Civility”? We can go there. You won’t like it. So far it has been the Ballot Box rather than the Ammo Box. …..But that can change if Civility is gonna go away.
How “uncivil” do y’all wanna get? Y’all wanna destroy that which I stand for and care  about…can I get all Uncivil too?

Do you really want the gloves to come off? The only thing keeping you and yours alive and fed and housed and/or out of prison is “Civility” and the rule of law. Take that protection away and you won’t like how it ends.

We have hard working people with a work ethic, who are well able to take care of themselves….who can think for themselves, are intelligent and skilled…who simply buckle down and move forward when life gets tough…..who plan ahead….Who are polite and decent and law abiding and moral.
 You have a bunch of  spoiled lazy people who can’t figure out which bathroom to use and have to be led to get them to do anything and who weep and demand help when life gets difficult…who can’t really DO anything…and have the attention span of a chipmunk and the intelligence of asparagus…..and who can’t think ahead farther than their next meal….who are rude and already uncivil and who don’t generally follow laws of society.
Which side do ya think will win if we get rid of “civility”?

So do you REALLY want to get rid of “Civility”? So far, that’ “civility” is what’s keeping you and yours safe.