Or: How unthinking environmentalist whackos activists fail to consider the law of unintended consequences.

In order. Interesting. Think about those folks.

Day One

Day 2

Day 3

Day four

Fifth day

Number 6

Day seven

Ocho

Day nine

Number 10

Eleven

Fannin

12

Diez y tres

after

Borepatch’s dad has passed. 

Send him some good thoughts.

See HERE.

So this would lead one to ask…..If the Liberal driven UK chooses to defund (at least their portion) the UN, can it really be that important? (We all know the answer to that, but to the liberals, it was a Big Thing).

One would wonder why the loss of funding, unless it was because they needed the money for their pet liberal projects inside the country, and the darkies, wogs, slant-eyes and furriners be damned.

But maybe I am just cynical…..

Now if we can only get the US folks to do the same: defund the UN, and maybe then begin chopping Bribes to Despots“foreign aid”.

Sometimes I think those followers of John Birch weren’t so crazy after all. 

When you pry it from my cold, dead body.”

Seriously….

At least, that is what I expect to soon have to tell the TSA and other DHS departments.

They would like to have THIS machine to collect and analyze you DNA quickly.

Of course, they would never, ever keep a database of any citizen’s DNA, would they? I mean, they have never ever kept illegal databases (databasi?) before, have they?

And you thought the porno scanners were invasive. 

or not.

seems that when budget cuts might affect people who get a proportionately larger slice of the pie, then it is time to cry racism.

For how long should these folks be propped up? When will they take steps to become self sufficient?

HEH

no one wants lowlife, ghetto thugs living in their neighborhood.

No One.

It’s not that these people are racist. Some are, after all, black. But they don’t want bad people fleeing a place where they helped to make a ghetto moving into their neighborhoods, where they will make the new place a new ghetto. 

What we see here is class issues. People moved to middle class suburbs for a reason. And they don’t want lowlifes to invade their neighborhoods and bring crime or blight to their homes and schools.

That is not racism, it is realism.

Cops are helping the unions in Wisconsin.

Now, while I am all for free speech, and I support the police choosing to support the union folks in their protest, I have several issues:

1. They were in full anti riot kit. IMO, this is a uniform. Had they been wearing civilian clothing, and not identifying themselves as police, then I would have few issues (although one might wonder about their loyalties, but that is another matter for another time).

B. Any time the police refuse to implement a lawful order…I.E :

“We have been ordered by the legislature to kick you all out at 4:00 today. But we know what’s right from wrong. We will not be kicking anyone out, in fact, we will be sleeping here with you!”

then they have broken their oaths and they should be subject to disciplinary action and/or terminated. While I am sympathetic to their dilemma, they have to choose their sides. (and this is a LAWFUL order, not an unlawful one that they could legally decide to ignore).

 III. If they choose to abrogate their responsibilities in support of the union, then that is indeed a choice that they have the right to make, they are free citizens after all, and can make the choice to side with the unions. They have a right to their opinions, and the right to support anyone they choose. BUT THEY CANNOT DECIDE WHICH LAWS THEY WILL ENFORCE AND WHICH THEY WILL NOT. It is an “all or nothing” thing here. There are no illegal or unconstitutional orders being given. It’s not like anyone can occupy the capitol at any time. Had I chosen to “occupy” the capitol 2 months ago, I would have been asked to leave, and then removed, had I chosen to ignore that order, possibly with trespassing charges thrown in for good measure. 

What we have here is people with conflicting loyalties who have shown us that they will not uphold the laws nor the (lawful) orders of their superiors. And this makes them unreliable, and unsuitable to be police. In any fashion. If the police cannot be depended upon to enforce order, no matter what their leanings, then they cannot be police.

Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

HT: WRSA