It would seem that the California Appeals Court has chosen to ignore a ruling by the US Supreme Court.

“… There is no basis for affording property rights less protection in the hands of legislators than administrators,” Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote for the court in April. “The Takings Clause applies equally to both – which means that it prohibits legislatures and agencies alike from imposing unconstitutional conditions on land-use permits.”

The high court vacated the first appeals court ruling and remanded it back to the court for further deliberations. But last month, the California court reaffirmed its first decision, finding that the traffic impact fees were constitutional despite the higher scrutiny advanced by the U.S. Supreme Court.

Why then, should anyone follow a ruling by either the Supremes or the California Appeals court?

If a lower court  (or any government agency) chooses to disregard a higher court, Then why should any of us follow any court ruling (or for that matter, any law at all) with which we  which we disagree?

Either we have the rule of law, adjudicated by the courts and enforced by the police, or we don’t. There is no middle ground. Law or Anarchy. Choose.

Minneapolis school shooter Robin Westman revealed as transgender and anti-Trump

There is a pattern here.

Leftist and trans or lesbian seems to be the thing for school shooters lately.

Perhaps we need to have better controls on people with gender issues.

If it saves one life…..

“Walk away with calmness””

“To make a bad time worse, spend it wishing for impossible dreams”

“No one else can see your potential if you don’t”

“Sometimes you have to let go of something good to make room for something better”

“Walk with grace”

“A goal in often not something to be reached, but rather something to aim for”

“It gets easier, eventually you just stop giving a fuck”

“If you love life, don’t waste time, for that is what life is made of”

“The people you associate with today will shape your future”

Pretty much as I expected, really. After some real, careful review, All the “Uncommanded Discharges” of the M18/P320 were simply found to be mishandling.

Additionally, a review of weapons discharges throughout Air Force Global Strike Command showed none had been attributed to malfunctions, the news release stated.

Much like the early GLOCK’s, the trigger safety caused a lot of people to shoot their firearm because they weren’t handled correctly. This is what led to the implementation of the “New York Trigger” because the NYC cops couldn’t be trusted to not shoot themselves or others with a normal trigger weight so they needed an extremely strong trigger spring to prevent the negligent discharges. Back then, the consensus was often that GLOCK firearms were supposed to be dangerous, but nearly all of the issues were “Booger Hook on the BangSwitch” issues (or stuff in the trigger guard when reholstering) , not mechanical failures. I believe that this is the issue with the SIG’s as well. The statistics bear my conclusion out. At this point, it is Urban Legend level of idiocy though.

Sig has mishandled the issue, but they are getting screwed in Social Media.

Took my parents shopping in Traverse City, along with a friend

It’s either a 5 ish hour drive or a 1 ish hour flight.

We flew. I own a decently fast airplane, after all.

We chose to burn some avgas and save some time. The choice is 38-40 gal per hour at 210 knots or so or 28-32 at 185 knots. We chose faster.

The flight up was hazy,, technically VFR (but not really) for much of the way,  and I did not get any decent photos of anything due to the haze at altitude……

This was on the way back, just above the clouds about 8 pm  heading more or less south southwest

200 knots at 10K

Shortly after that, we descended and it was clouds and IMC pretty much down to 4000 ft. A little bumpy in the clouds but not too bad….

(Sorry it is sideways, I don’t know why and do not have the tools to rotate it…..exercise is good for your neck, or turn your monitor )

So 1.2 up and 1.3 back, with about 0.4 IMC on the way north and 0.5 on the way back.  Both ways we had brutal (like 55 knots at one point) direct crosswinds at altitude.

The landing at KTVC was perfect: RWY 280 with 17kt gusting 26 at 320, and it was textbook perfect (I get lucky once in a while). Upwind wheel first (and I didn’t even chirp the tire), then the downwind one, then the nosewheel.  If you had had a drink in your hand the ice wouldn’t have even clinked. For once there were witnesses. I wish I had video, but I was too busy to hold a phone….

The landing back home was good, but not as perfect as the one at Traverse City.

A great day with my parents too. Shopping and then dinner at Sorellina. The only downside was that, because I was flying, I couldn’t have a glass of wine with dinner.

It don’t get much better than that though. The real reason I own a plane and fly is for days like that.

But I doubt it.

The DNC is strapped for cash, many of their big donors have chosen not to donate this election cycle.  So have many of their smaller, yet still significant donors.

And this just after DOGE cut all that funding to USAID and all the other NGO’s….you know, the ones that got billions in unsupervised taxpayer grants and who employed all those second and third sons and daughters of those wealthy people (who were unemployable in the private sector) at inflated salaries and that generated such huge profits in the procurement, shipping and distribution of “aid” by USAID and those NGO’s…..

Coincidence? Possibly, but I honestly think that this loss of donations is not just a random happening.

The US taxpayer was likely funding (if indirectly) much of the DNC this way. And now that those taxpayer funds have dried up, so have the donations….

American Eagle only makes Jeans up to size 18. (which is, IMO, still pretty large).

But they should market that fact….Loudly and unashamedly:

” We don’t care what the fat liberal women think, we only make jeans to size 18. If you can’t buy our jeans you can’t boycott us so we don’t care what you think and BTW, you are fat. It ain’t genetics, you are fat and lazy and unattractive, so Fuck Off”

The fact is that all the women who are complaining about this ad and Sydney Sweeney are too lazy to maintain themselves and are simply jealous of those who bother. And, rather than face their failures, the complain and find something like Nazi Racism to pin the complaint on.

40 or more years ago, we “Fat Shamed” women and men who were ..overweight. Then “Big and Beautiful” and all that bullshit came into the culture of women and now we have these women wo think it is ok to be 60 or more pounds overweight with diabetes and other health issues. ,,,,they were told it was ok to be obese.

Hint: It isn’t, and those of you who are fat know it isn’t, That’s why you complain about a healthy (and she ain’t all that terribly pretty) woman showing herself in an ad about jeans.

I mean, it’d sure get people interested in voting for you, I think…..

Force the US Postal Service to give you your actual mail separately from the 42 pieces of junk mail that they deliver to your mailbox so you can just toss the junk mail rather than having to sift through to find the 3 pieces of actual mail:

1. Your electric bill
2.  your credit card bill and/or bank statement.
3. the government form you have to fill out in order to stay free and not spend 3 months in jail and/or pay a fine or something…..

I get more junk mail that real mail. I actually could probably use the woodstove and the junk mail I receive yearly to heat my house for a month or more…..

Once again, lawfare for a Liberal cause.

Enough of this shit.

The Democrats ignored judges time and time again when they felt like it…with no repercussions.

Why should the Trump administration not do the same? You know, and I know that this latest ruling, by an Obama appointee, is just because the DNC led folks don’t like the fact that thousands upon thousands of illegals are being processed and removed from the country.

Judges like this (of whatever political stripe), who make blatantly partisan rulings such as this should be removed from office and barred from ever acting in the judiciary

Why should the Grand Jury testimony from the Epstein trials (Both Fla and NY) be such a tightly held secret?

What information in there is so dangerous to the country’s security (the only acceptable reason) that this needs to be hidden from the public?

Who has the wherewithal to influence so many people, people powerful in their own right, to keep the information under wraps? What information is in those files that the people named are working so hard to keep hidden?