Seems that every lying bastard “fiscal conservative” senator has been conspicuously absent when it came to supporting Senator Bunning.

Now that man has courage. Balls, if you will. Guts enough to stand up , and say “No!, Not until you explain how to pay for this!” .

But did ANYONE join him?

Bueller?…….Anyone?

[crickets]

Yep. That’s what I thought. Left him twisting in the wind, all alone.

Fuck’em all. Not one single Republican had the courage to stand beside him. Not one.

Conservatives, my ass.

Maybe I’ll go buy some rope….Just to have it on hand when the time comes.

Someone else bring the tar. And feathers. And pitchforks and torches too.

I already have the tree picked out.

Dislikes Mr. O’s latest health care plan.

Read here.

Get mad.

Call yer congressmen and women. Call yer Senators.

Think about getting out the tar, and feathers, and pitchforks, and rope….Scout out convenient trees and lampposts.

And tell ’em yer thinking about it.

But let them know that you will not only not vote for them, but will actively work against their reelection.

Then call ’em again tomorrow….And the next day. And the next.

Read more at Hamilton, Madison, and Jay..(see sidebar)

That’s gotta leave a mark

Here is the NOT recommended way….Circa 1952. Note the complete lack of safety measure.

Aah, the good old days.

Post Earthquake experiences in Chile….”I had to shoot people“

Now I know, yer thinking….”But that’s Chile, this is America”.

Now, think New Orleans and Katrina. Still think that way? Chile is, for all intents and purposes, not that different that the US when it comes to it’s people. But desperate people do desperate things…

Do you have enough Ammo? I know that I, while well stocked, really don’t. Have you practiced using a firearm? If not, then the one you have, without practice and familiarity, is useless. Practice often!

And the other thing you gotta remember is that you gotta sleep sometime. Got plans? Folks you can trust? Preps?

Best to think and prepare now, rather than afterward.

YMMV

ETA: Instapundit posts a link to this article….More food for thought.

By the British Parliament.

But you didn’t hear about the grilling of the University of East Anglia’s Prof. Phil Jones, the head of the Climate Research Unit and the man at ground zero of ClimateGate, did you?  Maybe on the Internet but not via the American MSM….I guess it didn’t meet the liberal, America hating ,”destroy progress” agenda that they have. (It most likely makes AlGore cry or something)

You should ask yourself why there has been nearly no coverage here is the US. Perhaps Barry O needs the Cap and Trade money to pay for his Socialized Healthcare scheme or something….

Go to the link, follow the links therein. Worth the read.

A NEW Scary Black Gun Assault Weapons Ban ! Yeah, That’ll help. 

IF they even try, I can see a GOP landslide come this election season.

Once, a man wiser than me suggested to me that when I found myself in a hole, I should stop digging. A good lesson then.

Apparently Mr. Obama and the DNC haven’t learned that part yet.

And via NPR, at that:

This article on an NPR series of cost of health care…..

Wow. I guess that they CAN be objective.

And all this time I had quit litening to them because of their (very large) liberal bias.

It’s like the National Enquirer dong real journalism…..

I may have to listen to them on the morning commute now.

Thanks for being my Mom, and putting up with me all these years.

I love ya.

I’m not, I’m not, I’m not…

But the thought of submarines filled with women could lead one down that path….

Seriously, though, WTF? Why the push to force the Navy to accept women everwhere?

I’m not bashing women, and I am not saying that they can’t do the job. But much like the controversy with DADT, there ARE issues with women and men (and, for that matter, homosexuals) being in close proximity to other genders/sexual orientations for extended periods. On shore is one thing, in a ship (less room), another….In a sub (even less room), yet another. Perhaps subs staffed with women only?

The Navy will have to refit the sanitary facilities, and privacy, always an issue among hetero men (and even moreso with ladies), will become an even greater issue.

WHY?

What gain is there? More combat effectiveness? I doubt it.

Just so some militant feminist(s) can be submariners? Or is it something else?

When will it end?

Yeah, I know, all the old arguments that are rehashed each and every time this comes up, but the fact is that there WILL be issues, there are issues now with women and men on ships as it stands.

And I bet the wives of these men will NOT be happy with this. Which WILL lead to issues and those men may not want to re-up. ’cause if momma ain’t happy no one is happy.

But all is good, I suppose, as long as we get a truly feminized integrated force……The PC folks will do anything to get their way, even to the weakening of our military.

ETA: related article HERE