Peeve

Why do printer and fax manufacturers give you error codes (ex: error 347) instead of a description of what the fucking error is? 347 means nothing unless you have the manual in front of you, and how many of us can even find the frigging manual after a week or so?

WHY NOT just put a basic description of the error (eg: “no dial tone” or “receiving fax unable to handshake properly”) or whatever instead of an error that is meaningless to anyone who was not part of the development team?

So it would seem

That the IRS was paying an outside vendor to back up emails from IRS employees.

If congress really wants to get to the bottom of this (which I am beginning to doubt, suspecting that the whole Faux Outrage is just for show) all they have to do is subpoena the company’s data. Simple to do, and if THEY (SonaSoft) have lost the data, then we all will know for sure that there is a coverup. There can be only so many coincidences….

Were I the president of SonaSoft, I’d have already pulled the appropriate emails and would have them sitting in a thumb drive waiting for the appropriate parties to request them. (or I’d be waiting for my truckload of used bills to be delivered to my bank account in Geneva….)

If Congress chooses not to subpoena the emails from the backup company, SonaSoft, then we all will know that we are being played…and that Ryan and his ilk are as much a part of things as Obama and Lerner.

Which opens up a whole shitload of other options.

Lampposts, ropes, cartridge boxes, Rails, tar and feathers, these are a few of the things I dream about….

Perhaps it is time we watered a tree.….

The alternatives, for both us and those who follow us, are worse that what could happen if that tree is watered.

So, exactly what

Just what the fuck are you gonna do about it, Mr Ryan and Congress?

JUST WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT THE IRS?

Are you going to start charging people with impeding an investigation?

With destroying evidence?

Lying to congress?

Conspiracy in all of the above?

You are a bunch of useless blowhards…unless people START BEING ARRESTED AND BEING PUT IN PRISON FOR THESE OFFENSES TO THE CITIZENS OF THESE UNITED STATES.

All of you bloviating, you words, your faux outrage mean NOTING until you start putting people in jail.

When does that start?

Well, We’re waitng….

Disturbing

Cop or not. Slitting the throat of a dog?

And, apparently, at this time, No longer a cop.

Which is good, sorta. Thing is, how did a person like this ever become a cop. How did his fellow cops not see the psychopath inside him? And if they did, then how was he still a cop?

I know, the Blue Line/Blue Wall….Which is why the police aren’t respected anymore.

I’m not trying to bash cops here…thousands of cops did everything right yesterday, harmed no one, and treated everyone they met well.

But how is it that a cop could do this?

If true, then they planned this 6 months ago or more

See HERE for an interesting post about the feds soliciting bids for escorts for unaccompanied alien children to be taken to regional shelters.

Things that make ya go HMMM?

I have no way to verify this, one way or another, so I don’t know….But it fits. Fits with the Fast and Furious debacle, fits with so many other Obama methods that are designed to make a statement for the press that can be used to convince the generally un informed public to go along with the proposed solution.

You decide.

HT Golden Goose

Politics over law

SO if the US Patent and Trademark office can, arbitrarily, decide to renege on the protections that are basic to a trademark, can they also do so with a patent, just because a political figure chooses to lend his support to having those protections removed? Especially because some group of people feels that the name is offensive to them? Can they decide that a patent is also null and void because some group whines loudly enough?

Really, this is again a destruction of our laws and protections that we have used for over 200 years.

How can we allow such heavy handed actions?

Look, I am sorry that the Native Americans don’t like the name “Redskins” and the associated logo. However, no one says that they have to like it, nor do they get priority in the law over the owner of the trademarked logo and name. Nowhere in our constitution is there a right to not be offended.