“Fidelity, Bravery, INTEGRITY” my ass. None of those characteristics seem to describe even one person at the FBI.
Sure, they turn “Whistleblower” NOW, but where were they then? Why are we hearing about this now, and not 3 years ago? WHERE WERE THEY?
The FBI, both the administrators, as well as the agents, covered up the bribery of a Vice President by foreign agents. Covered up all of the other crimes perpetrated by Hunter as documented in his laptop. Hid the malfeasance of both Joe and Hunter (and who knows how many other people?).
Anyone and everyone who had knowledge and kept their mouths shut, who “Followed Orders”, who simply stood by and said nothing should be prosecuted, tried, and when (if) found guilty be at least fired and lose their pensions, if not imprisoned.
All the way from the bottom to the top.
Sigh… never happen, too many CYA types will prevent it.
They don’t just know…they are COMPLICIT.
There is a substantial difference between “bystander,” “participant” and “willing accomplice.”
The U.S. was arguably created in 1776 with the Declaration of Independence, and the original issue of the current Constitution was ratified in 1788. The FBI was created in 1908. So, depending on what start date one selects we did without a FBI for 132 years (1908-1776) of 120 years (1908-1788), so in either case we’ve not had an FBI for more than half the country’s existence. Things seemed to go reasonably well back then, I’d suggest considerably better than lately, we should try it again.
That the Constitution does not specify such an agency – not to mention no stipulation for nearly all of the others as well – should provide additional justification to abolishing it. The real trick will be preventing Congress and the Executive from cash injection and mission creep inflating some other agency – I’m thinking the U.S. Marshall Service – into the same position.
Anon 2