’tis interesting

How some people who have no knowledge pontificate on how the vaccines work, or the new Meck Covid pill work, or how Ivermectin doesn’t.

When it becomes obvious that they are unsure how RNA works, or how mRNA works, much less how the Merck drug damages the duplication in RNA…Or that they have even looked beyond the headlines when it comes to the data on our current treatments…

I am pretty sure that they never had biology much past high school, and that their main source of data is Wikipedia and Slate….And the New York Times and CBSNBCABC

It shows when they try to explain how Ivermectin is useless and dangerous for humans and such, and how the Covid mRNA stuff is safe….And an untested Cytosine analogue will not damage the RNA of anything but the Covid virus….Or even how such treatments work (or don’t).

I find it interesting that they claim that Ivermectin is untested and unsafe, but fail to realize that it has been around (and used on humans) since the early 80’s….but it is an unsafe “HorsePaste” because that is it’s main use here in the United States (but is used extensively by humans throughout the rest of the world)….but they are willing to take a treatment that has had very little testing and whose rate of side effects (and death) would make any other “Vaccine” be pulled from the market (look up the Swine Flu vaccine for an example)….. and all this for a disease with a 99+% rate of survival.

These people have bought into the fear, and see the government-approved pharmaceuticals as their savior…their belief is much like the folks who say we Must Do Something about Global Warming even though the data is crap and the temperature measurements simply don’t bear the “warming” hypothesis out…..and yet don’t want to live the lifestyle they preach for others….I wonder if the Venn diagrams for those folks overlap a lot?


One thought on “’tis interesting

Comments are closed.