For all you 9-11 idiots who claim

that “Buildings don’t fall into their own footprint unless brought down with demolition explosives” and other utter bullshit about how building collapse and how 9-11 was somehow “Different”……

Get over it. Here are several views from an earthquake in Bangkok that brought down several buildings

Go find another conspiracy to repeat over and over showing your ignorance.

When you say shit like “Buildings don’t just fall into their own footprint” you sound as if you failed 8th grade science and are particularly stupid and stubborn….(which is mostly a truism of people who believe in truly outrageous conspiracies)

 

 

Funny how things, even buildings, fall….down. That darned gravity and all. Do you really expect them to fall over sideways in one piece like a beer bottle at a frat party?

 

 

13 thoughts on “For all you 9-11 idiots who claim

  1. Earthquakes affect the building top to bottom, weakening the whole support structure. In the 9-11 incident , the planes hit near the top of the buildings , the support structure was still 75+ percent intact.

    • Ya know, I’m not a structural engineer but if the fires in the building weakened the steel and one floor collapsed on the one below it……………………….
      Literally not rocket surgery.
      Going to stop right there and ignore all replies..

    • I figured someone would come up with that excuse. You folks always have to find something to keep your fantasy alive.

      Yer Most Obviously not a structural engineer. If you were or if you knew anything we’d not be having this conversation….

      But don’t let it stop your fantasy version of reality

  2. Building 7 wasn’t hit at all, just conveniently that fact never gets brought up. Yeah, all the other conspiracy theories have all been proven true, but this one, NAH no way!!
    Keep slopping up their bullshit my good man

    • Building 7 was hit at the base by debris from towers 1 and 2.

      Keep denying reality.

      What color is the sky in your world?

  3. Even my chosen career path was nursing, I took several Physics and geology classes for my science requirements and know the angle of momentum for buildings are down… unless acted on by a force greater than its balance can it topple sideways. Gravity is a cold bitch. I just shake my head at the ignorance and lack of a proper education that doesn’t stop people from spurting their comments.

    • Have you ever cut a tree down and had it fall exactly as you thought – every time? Amazingly buildings exhibit the same behavior, it is physics actually and not a random night course variety.

      • If you are comparing a semi-rigid object like a tree falling to a building collapsing then you must not be much of an engineer. An real engineer understanding structures wouldn’t even begin to make such a comparison. What kind of engineer are you?

  4. I always wonder why people are vociferously opposed to alternate theories. Your house, your rules, but not rational. And I am an engineer.

    • So explain then the “alternate theory: that the Twin Towers weren’t felled by a multi-ton plane impacting and then burning inside of them. What plausible “alternate theory” would you promulgate? (plausible being an important word here)

      And how somehow a building is supposed to fall anywhere but “in it’s own footprint” when such a disaster happens?

      Please, I’d like to know how you expected it to fail and fall.

      Feel free to use this space to explain.
      How else should it have failed? What direction and how should it have collapsed besides downwards onto it’s base?

      • DUDE !!!
        alternate theory……………….
        Double naught spies were seen in in every custodial room in both towers and they put hidden explosives there…

        • Could be….And everyone missed them holes in the walls so they could place them in the proper areas. Just a bit of spackle and paint to hide ’em…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *