We didn’t vote for Amnesty:

We voted for deportations. GTF out or be thrown out.

Charlie Kirk is sounding the alarm over what he claims is growing pressure from “ruling class” donors urging President Donald Trump to trade deportations for amnesty

I don’t care if the business owners and farm owners and other businesses and the “Ruling Class” need cheap labor. They can pay more or invest in automation. Not every business gets cheap labor from illegals and they somehow survive. I ran a motel for 20 years without illegal labor. Even made money some years. If the farms need labor, they can pay for it, same-same slaughterhouses, hotels, construction gangs, etc.

If the donations dry up, too bad…the votes won’t.

We want the illegals gone. Period,, Stop

 

12 thoughts on “We didn’t vote for Amnesty:

  1. You Bet Your Ass We Want Them Gone!

    I’m sure there are many more like me that has given up on the GOP and only still voting because Trumps is doing what we want done. When that stops – We stop!

    • You’re right that some folks are only still voting because they think Trump’s delivering what they want. But I’ve also seen the other side — people who want tighter immigration policy until it costs them more to eat, build, or live comfortably.

      When prices go up and services slow down, the question becomes: how many folks are willing to trade their comfort for their politics?

      • “seen the other side — people who want tighter immigration policy until it costs them more to eat, build, or live comfortably”

        When did you see that? It hasn’t happened in the US in the past 50 years.

        Or are you just parroting the DNC party line again? (Or are you gonna use the excuse that that is what the Media is reporting and you are just telling us what the are saying)?

        • It’s happened plenty of times — and it’s happening now. You can ask meatpackers in Iowa, farmers in California, or homebuilders in Texas — none of them need talking points to tell you what labor shortages did to their bottom lines.

          That’s the political bind: some want tighter immigration and low costs. But you can’t cut the labor force and still expect cheap eggs and fast construction.

          It’s not about party lines — it’s supply and demand. Remove a huge chunk of the labor supply, and unless something fills that gap, costs rise. That’s not a narrative. That’s basic economics.

          • So your point is that costs were artificially low due to having illegals in the workforce. What we’re seeing now is a market correction. Also basic economics.

            • Exactly — that’s the tension. If the public truly embraces a “market correction,” then we should also expect them to stop complaining about food prices, labor delays, or rising costs in construction and services.

              But they do complain — loudly. Which tells me the appetite for “correction” stops where the wallet starts hurting. That’s not party-line thinking — it’s just how supply and demand plays out in the real world.

              • How much does the change from a $15/hour illegal cutting meat to a $30/hour legal meatcutter really change the cost of meat per pound? Pennies, at best.

                Same with Construction, or lettuce….the labor isn’t that large of a percentage of the cost that it greatly raises the price. All it really did for any of it was lower the profits. The price is market driven, not labor cost driven.
                T say otherwise is a lie, you don’t appear to be stupid enough to miss the basic concept of what has set the costs…… You don’t seem that stupid, so you must be parroting the narrative.

  2. This would cause us to lose the midterms and maybe Vance losing in 28……
    I don’t expect to agree with everything he does, but this is a core point to stay on..

Leave a Reply to MC Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *