So it seems that what they thought was a painting by a Rembrandt protege is actually likely an actual painting by Rembrandt himself.
Of course this painting has been examined by “Experts” many times. No doubt the “experts” were sure and had reached a “Consensus” on the “fact” that it was not a Rembrandt.
Top Men there in the art world. I wonder if the decision was “peer reviewed”?
Hehehe, but the 'science' is settled… It was…