The fact that they feel they have to refute this

Tells us a lot, don’t it?

I mean, it is not impossible, and is, in fact, a likely as not. I mean, they cheated in a national election 4 years or so ago, so why wouldn’t they do this?

Kamala Harris, who has claimed to believe that Bluetooth headphones are a ‘security risk’, was accused of wearing earphones disguised as pearl earrings to aide her during the 90-minute debate against Donald Trump

I mean it was obvious that the two “Moderators” for the debate were in the tank for her, and likely so was the entire production team…..why should we believe that they would not overlook something like this?

They moderators lied in their ‘Fact Checking” (vehemently, did you notice?)  so why should we think that this sort of cheat  would bother them?

On the other hand, how would you prove or (disprove) the accusation?

3 thoughts on “The fact that they feel they have to refute this

  1. The company that produces these things is denying that she is wearing them because of some design differences. Duh, and the “builder” can’t make different style objects? They are “always” just like the original design?

  2. Never mind that when Biden did his “debate,” in which NO NOTES WERE PERMITTED, he is REPEATEDLY seen holding a set of notes during the “show.” This wasn’t a legal pad for scratching notes. These were PREPARED NOTES.

    Why WOULDN’T Cameltoe cheat? It would be a break from her character and that of the DNC NOT to cheat!

Comments are closed.