Can someone explain to me

How, except for Character Assassination, the current testimony in Sean (P-Diddy) Combs’s trial is relevant to his criminal charges?

 

He is accused of/Charged with Racketeering, Sex Trafficking, and Transportation of Prostitutes.

How is the testimony of his girlfriend, who chose to stay with him for over 10 years and who willingly participated in the freaky stuff (and it was, apparently pretty freaky), relevant to his criminal trial? ETA: She claims she didn’t leave because she “Didn’t have the resources to leave”…..that should show her character right there.

 

This is similar to the other trials wherein someone chose to attack a rich black man who wouldn’t toe the line, I think. They destroyed the reputation as part of the punishment.

This testimony is not about the crimes, but rather to make him look bad. A real judge who was looking for the truth would question the relevance or  would not allow it.

One thought on “Can someone explain to me

  1. The same reason a NY judge allowed the restore the stripper Stormy Daniel’s at Trump’s “triall”. It’s all about the sensationalism, feeding the judges ego by getting mentioned in the press.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *